VinciWorks attended a recent event hosted by Thomson Reuters titled Modern Slavery, Bribery and Corruption. The international panel included Nick Grono, CEO of the Freedom Fund, Dan Viederman, CEO of Verité, Duncan Jepson, CEO of Liberty Asia, Martina Vandenberg, Founder and President of the Human Trafficking Pro Bono Legal Center and Mike Harris from World-Check.

The panel – which coincided with the publishing of two new reports: Modern Slavery and Corruption and An Exploratory Study on the Role of Corruption in International Labour Migration – focused on the relationship between modern slavery and corruption. The discussion provided an overview of the current legislation around the world, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which has been used effectively in the United States to prosecute human traffickers.

The key takeaway from the discussion was that slavery can only take place when corruption is present. At some stage in the process, someone must turn a blind eye, pay a bribe or falsify records to facilitate human trafficking or forced labour. Organisations should never be able to say “we were not aware” because the warning signs and the records of corruption are almost always there to be found. Continue reading

ASIC has started legal action in the Federal Court of Australia against German construction group holding company Hochtief Aktiengesellschaft (Hochtief AG), seeking a declaration of contravention and a financial penalty order against the company for insider trading.

ASIC’s action centres on the early 2014 on-market acquisition of ordinary shares of Leighton Holdings Limited (now called CIMIC Group Limited) (ASX code: LEI) by Hochtief AG’s subsidiary, Hochtief Australia Holdings Limited (HAHL).

ASIC alleges that Hochtief AG contravened the insider trading provisions of the Corporations Act by procuring HAHL to acquire LEI when, on, 29 January 2014, it varied previous instructions to acquire a large parcel of LEI (by pushing out the last day to purchase the shares from 31 January 2014 to 14 February 2014) while it was in possession of insider information, being that Leighton Holdings Limited’s 2013 financial results were likely to be at the high end of previous earnings guidance.

Hochtief AG has admitted the alleged contravention.

Read the full press release

Updated Tuesday, August 30, 2016

In April 2016 the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) was signed into law by the European Union. It will take effect in all member states two years after its formal adoption.

The regulation represents the most significant global development in data protection law since the EU Data Protection Directive in 1995. A “regulation”, unlike a “directive”, will be applicable in all EU member states without the need for national legislation. The regulation’s aim is to harmonise data protection law across all member states. It will supersede the UK Data Protection Act.

The changes are designed to make sure that people’s personal information is protected – no matter where it is sent, processed or stored – even outside the EU. They will give people more control over their own personal data. Continue reading

Today, January 12, is the last time Microsoft will deliver security updates to users that are still using Internet Explorer 8 as well as most users that are still on versions 9 or 10.

From now on, only the most recent version of Internet Explorer available for a supported operating system will receive technical support and security updates. For example, customers using Internet Explorer 8, Internet Explorer 9, or Internet Explorer 10 on Windows 7 SP1 must migrate to Internet Explorer 11 to continue receiving security updates and technical support. Continue reading

VinciWorks has just released the new course — Diversity: A Practical Overview.

In just 30 minutes, the course provides an overview of the key obligations and best practice impacting day-to-day work at the firm. It digests the material into concise principles, featuring media stories and legal precedents that bring the topic to life.

Diversity training is an imperative first step to protecting the rights of individuals and advancing equality of opportunity for all. The course outlines the behaviours expected of all employees, the reasons to comply with those behaviours and the consequences of non-compliance.

The course is designed to adapt beautifully to any size screen, and provides an engaging and immersive learning experience. It is recommended for use by anyone at the firm as part of the onboarding process or as a regular refresher.

Learn more

In October 2015 HM Treasury and the Home Office conducted a National Risk Assessment of Money Laundering in the UK. The assessment found “significant concerns about the levels of [money laundering] compliance in the estate agency sector“. The money laundering risk within the sector was assessed to be medium. It was not assessed higher, despite the non-compliance, due to the fact that the capacity for estate agents to be used to launder money without the involvement of other professionals is limited as they do not handle funds. Below is a summary of the money laundering risks and obligation in the real estate sector.

The market

At the start of 2014, there were estimated to be over 20,000 businesses in the UK carrying out estate agent activities. More than 85% of these were micro-businesses, employing less than 10 employees. The combined annual turnover of businesses carrying out real estate activities on a fee or contract basis was over £16 billion. There were over 1 million residential property transactions in the UK in 2013, worth nearly £254 billion. The non-residential property market saw approximately 59,000 transactions, worth nearly £86 billion.

Beginning with the Second Money Laundering Directive, adopted in 2001, the anti-money laundering obligations of the Directive were extended to a number of non-financial services. Those services include independent legal professionals, accountants, estate agents and tax advisors.

The regulations apply to those carrying out services related to the purchase or sale of property. They do not currently apply to businesses which only provide letting agency or property management services.

Money laundering risks

There are a few key money laundering risks in the real estate profession:

Complicit and negligent professionals

Property is a favoured method for criminals to integrate the proceeds of crime into the legitimate economic and financial system, often after layering the proceeds using legal entities and arrangements. For many estate agents, even if effective due diligence is in place there may be challenges in law enforcement identifying the proceeds of crime.

Estate agents are required by law to identify their customer, generally the vendor. In addition, some estate agents may also conduct due diligence on the buyer, often for commercial reasons. The absence of robust CDD processes within some elements of the sector combined with low SARs reporting leads to low levels of information for law enforcement agencies to act on. Furthermore, there are complicit professional enablers intent on concealing the illicit nature of the client’s activities.

Lack of training and low compliance levels

HMRC and law enforcement agencies report that the standard of AML/CFT compliance in the real estate needs to be strengthened, and that firms often lack understanding of what is required of them under the regulations and POCA, including applying customer due diligence and submission of SARs. There a lack of understanding in the sector as to which entities are covered by the regulations, specifically that the regulations cover not only high street estate agents, but also commercial estate agents, land and property auctioneers, and relocation agents.

Training is another area that is lacking in the sector. Whilst robust training programmes exist in the financial and legal sectors, many estate agencies reported that they did not administer proper training. The VinciWorks suite of anti-money laundering courses for estate agents enables estate agencies to train their staff easily and effectively. The courses are customisable to include internal procedures and a full audit trail tracks course completions. The courses are based on UK legislation and the HMRC guidance on money laundering for estate agents.

Supervision

By law, HMRC are responsible for supervising the anti-money laundering activities of estate agencies. Firms do not always register or otherwise identify themselves for supervision, which presents challenges for them as a supervisor, and it is expected that there is a shortfall of estate agent businesses on the register. Among those estate agents that are registered, HMRC and law enforcement agencies report that the standard of AML/CFT compliance needs to be strengthened, and that firms often lack understanding of what is required of them under the regulations and POCA.

International exposure of the UK property market

4 The UK property market attracts significant amounts of foreign investment, particularly in London. In 2013, estate agents Knight Frank reported that, in London, foreign buyers made up 56 63% of new build transactions and 42% of prime market transactions. The UK property market is made more vulnerable because property can be purchased through off-shore holding companies which obscure the ownership and residency of those using the properties. Once the property is purchased it is a long and complicated process for law enforcement agencies to investigate, restrain, and recover criminal property.

Low levels of SARs reports

There are concerns over the number and quality of suspicious activities reports submitted by the sector. In 2013/14 there were 179 SARs submitted by the sector, a drop of 17% on 2012/13. This figure is low compared to other sectors.

VinciWorks has released version 2 of the Policy Tracker. The new system features:

  • Unlimited policies
  • Less than 3 minutes to deploy
  • One fixed price
  • No IT support required

What is a policy tracker?

It is a simple way to guarantee that users read, understand and acknowledge corporate policies. It sends policies to relevant staff and keeps track of who opened the policies, how long they spent reading them and who actively acknowledged them.

What is new in version 2.0?

Continue reading