By 2026, cryptoassets are no longer a niche or experimental sector. They are squarely on the radar of regulators throughout the world. Concerns over financial stability, consumer protection, market integrity, illicit finance and systemic risk have pushed crypto onto the agendas of the EU, the UK, and major global markets. Regulation is shifting from uncertainty to reality and moving from framework-setting to active supervision and enforcement. For UK organisations, the challenge will be navigating divergent but overlapping rules across jurisdictions while maintaining operational resilience, compliance, and strategic flexibility.

From frameworks to enforcement

Crypto regulation is no longer just about setting high-level principles. Across the EU, UK, and key international markets, regulators are moving toward active supervision, enforcement, and detailed operational requirements. In the EU, the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) is coming into full effect, introducing licensing requirements for issuers, custodians, and service providers, alongside stringent transparency and consumer protection obligations. In parallel, the EU is preparing for cross-sectoral oversight, linking crypto compliance with anti-money laundering (AML), market abuse, and systemic risk frameworks.

 

In the UK, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has signalled increased scrutiny of crypto businesses, with a focus on consumer protection, market integrity, and AML compliance. UK organisations must align with both domestic rules and EU standards where they operate cross-border, creating a regulatory landscape that is complex, overlapping, and actively enforced.

 

Meanwhile, global regulators in the US, Singapore, and other major markets are also moving from advisory guidance to formal licensing, reporting, and enforcement regimes, reflecting the growing recognition that cryptoassets have material financial and systemic impacts.

 

For organisations, this means that crypto compliance is no longer optional. Firms issuing, trading, or providing custody services must implement robust governance, reporting, and risk management processes now to operate safely in 2026 and beyond.

 

Key developments to watch in 2026

 

Crypto goes mainstream and global regulatory expectations converge

 

At a global level, crypto regulation is converging around a shared set of policy objectives:

• Preventing money laundering and terrorist financing 
• Protecting consumers and retail investors 
• Preserving financial stability 
• Integrating crypto into existing financial regulatory frameworks 

 

International standard-setters such as the Financial Stability Board (FSB), FATF, IOSCO and Basel Committee have already set expectations for cryptoasset oversight. By 2026, these standards will increasingly be reflected in national laws, supervisory practices and enforcement actions.

 

This means crypto businesses should expect:

• Less regulatory arbitrage between jurisdictions 
• Greater information-sharing between regulators 
• Increased expectations around governance, risk management and transparency 

Crypto is becoming part of mainstream financial regulation, not a parallel system.

 

EU: MiCA moves from implementation to enforcement

 

MiCA Becomes Fully Operational

 

The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) will be fully in force by 2026. While MiCA formally applies earlier, 2026 is the year when:

 

• National competent authorities move from onboarding to active supervision 
• ESMA and EBA guidance becomes operationalised 
• Enforcement expectations harden 

 

MiCA introduces a comprehensive regime for:

 

• Crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) 
• Issuers of asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens 
• White paper disclosures 
• Market abuse controls 
• Prudential, governance and conduct requirements 

For firms operating in or targeting the EU, MiCA compliance will no longer be theoretical. Supervisors will expect demonstrable controls, not just policies.

 

AML, travel rule and crypto transparency

 

Alongside MiCA, the EU’s AML package, including the Transfer of Funds Regulation, brings crypto firmly within AML/CFT supervision, covering both operational conduct and financial crime obligations. By 2026:

 

• The travel rule will be fully embedded across EU crypto transfers 
• Anonymous crypto transactions will be severely constrained 
• AMLA (the new EU AML Authority) will begin shaping supervisory convergence 

This significantly raises compliance expectations for crypto intermediaries, custodians and platforms.

 

UK: A distinct but interoperable crypto regime

 

UK crypto regulation takes shape under FSMA

 

The UK has chosen a phased, outcomes-based approach to crypto regulation, integrating cryptoassets into the existing Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) framework rather than creating a standalone regime like MiCA.

 

By 2026, the UK is expected to have:

 

• A regulated regime for cryptoasset issuance, custody, trading and intermediation 
• FCA supervision focused on conduct, financial promotions and consumer protection 
• Strong alignment with UK AML rules and the Travel Rule 

The UK’s approach prioritises flexibility and innovation, but this does not mean lighter regulation. Instead, firms will need to meet familiar financial-services standards applied to crypto-specific risks.

 

UK–EU divergence: Practical, not philosophical

 

While UK and EU regimes will diverge in structure, they are aligned in substance:

• Governance, risk management and financial crime controls 
• Transparency and disclosure 
• Consumer protection 

For UK organisations serving EU clients, this creates a dual-compliance challenge: MiCA obligations for EU-facing activities, and UK FSMA/FCA rules domestically.

 

US AI and crypto policy: A converging agenda

 

While crypto regulation is moving into active supervision globally, developments in US AI policy also have indirect implications for the sector. In December 2025, President Trump signed an executive order limiting state-level AI regulations in favor of a centralised federal framework. This approach prioritises innovation and national competitiveness while reducing regulatory fragmentation across states.

 

For crypto organisations, this signals a broader trend in US technology policy. Regulators are increasingly seeking coordinated, national frameworks for emerging technologies rather than leaving rules to patchwork state or sector-level governance. This matters because AI and crypto are converging in areas such as algorithmic trading, DeFi protocols, risk modelling and fraud detection, where AI tools are embedded in crypto systems. Firms operating in both spaces will need to monitor US AI developments closely, as federal AI rules could influence operational standards, reporting obligations, and compliance expectations for crypto-related AI applications.

 

Global organisations cannot treat AI and crypto in isolation. US policy changes in one domain can ripple across others, affecting both technology governance and regulatory strategy.

 

Enforcement and supervision: The stakes rise

 

By 2026, regulators globally will be less focused on defining crypto risks and more focused on enforcing compliance.

 

Expect:

• Increased supervisory scrutiny of governance and internal controls 
• Enforcement action against misleading disclosures and poor consumer outcomes 
• Close examination of stablecoins, custody arrangements and insolvency protections 

Crypto failures will increasingly be treated like failures in traditional financial services, not experimental mishaps.

 

Stablecoins, payments and financial stability

 

Stablecoins remain a focal point for policymakers due to their potential systemic impact.

 

By 2026:

 

• Stablecoin issuers will face bank-like expectations around reserves, redemption and governance 
• Payment-related crypto activity will be closely regulated 
• Interoperability with traditional payment systems will be monitored 

Both the EU and UK are clear that stablecoins operating at scale cannot exist outside financial regulation.

 

DeFi, tokenisation and emerging use cases

 

Decentralised finance (DeFi), tokenisation of real-world assets, and on-chain infrastructure pose more complex regulatory questions. While fully decentralised systems remain difficult to regulate, by 2026 regulators will increasingly focus on:

 

• Control points (developers, front ends, governance structures) 
• Hybrid models combining decentralisation with intermediaries 
• Tokenisation projects involving securities, funds or real assets 

Organisations should not assume DeFi or tokenisation sits outside regulatory scope — particularly where there is identifiable control or consumer exposure.

 

What does this all mean for UK organisations?

 

Crypto is now a regulated financial activity

 

By 2026, crypto businesses should assume they are operating in a regulated financial environment, even if specific rules differ by jurisdiction.

This requires:

 

• Formal governance structures 
• Clear accountability 
• Documented risk management and controls 

Dual and multi-jurisdictional compliance is the norm

 

UK organisations operating internationally will need to:

 

• Map activities against MiCA, UK FSMA and global standards 
• Segment operations where necessary 
• Avoid assuming UK compliance equals EU compliance 

Compliance is a strategic issue, not a back-office function

 

Regulatory readiness will influence:

 

• Market access 
• Partnerships with banks and institutions 
• Investor confidence 

Strong compliance frameworks can be a competitive advantage, not just a cost.

 

A 2026 crypto readiness checklist

• Map your crypto activities by jurisdiction and regulatory perimeter
• Identify whether you are a CASP (Crypto asset service provider) under MiCA or a regulated activity under UK FSMA
• Strengthen governance, risk and AML controls
• Prepare for supervisory engagement and inspections
• Monitor divergence between UK and EU regimes and plan accordingly

 

Is 2026 a turning point for crypto?

By 2026, crypto law and policy will have moved from experimentation to enforcement. The era of regulatory ambiguity is ending, replaced by structured regimes, coordinated supervision and real consequences for non-compliance.

 

Crypto innovation remains possible but now only within a framework of governance, transparency and regulatory engagement. It’s time to invest in compliance and strategic alignment so you can operate, scale and earn trust in an increasingly regulated global crypto ecosystem.

 

Our AML Fundamentals course in cryptocurrency provides an overview of money laundering, explains how cryptocurrency could inadvertently be used in the money laundering chain, and who to contact in the event of any suspicions. Try it here.